A startling confession has emerged from actor Woody Harrelson, revealing a disturbing fantasy involving former President Donald Trump. During a recent interview, Harrelson described a scenario where he contemplated harming Trump, expressing a desire to administer cyanide.
The comments arose during a discussion about his past aspirations to become a Secret Service agent. Harrelson admitted the idea faded when he realized the portrayal of agents on television wasn’t reality. He then bluntly stated he wouldn’t be able to fulfill protective duties for Trump.
“I’d be wanting to slip him some cyanide instead of jumping in front of a bullet,” Harrelson said, a statement that quickly ignited controversy and circulated widely on social media. The remark paints a chilling picture of his personal feelings towards the former president.
This revelation is particularly striking given Harrelson’s recent public endorsements of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s presidential campaign. He has previously lauded Kennedy for his willingness to challenge powerful pharmaceutical companies, describing his actions as “heroic.”
During an appearance on a popular podcast, Harrelson passionately defended Kennedy, highlighting his courage in speaking out against forces that could have damaged his reputation. He also launched a fierce critique of a former public health official, labeling him a “monster” for wielding significant power during a recent global health crisis.
Harrelson’s outspoken views and willingness to challenge established narratives have made him a controversial figure. However, the nature of his recent comments has moved beyond political disagreement into deeply unsettling territory.
Adding another layer of complexity to the story is the actor’s family history. His father, Charles Harrelson, lived a life steeped in crime and was a convicted contract killer who ultimately died while incarcerated. This dark legacy casts a long shadow over the current situation.
The actor’s words have sparked intense debate, raising questions about the line between political expression and threats of violence. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the charged atmosphere surrounding political discourse and the potential for extreme rhetoric.
