The political landscape of Texas shifted dramatically as former House Speaker Dade Phelan announced he would not seek reelection, effectively ending his career in state politics. The news was met with a swift and celebratory response from former President Donald Trump, who pointedly noted Phelan’s departure as a win for the state.
Trump directly accused Phelan of obstructing key legislative priorities, specifically citing the failure to advance bills focused on voter integrity and school choice. The former President’s statement carried a clear tone of vindication, suggesting Phelan’s exit clears the path for policies he champions.
The circumstances surrounding Phelan’s political downfall extended beyond policy disagreements. In May of the previous year, Attorney General Ken Paxton publicly called for Phelan’s resignation, alleging inappropriate conduct within the Capitol building – specifically, accusations of public intoxication.
Paxton didn’t stop there. He followed up with a broader condemnation of what he termed “RINOs” within the Texas House, igniting a fierce internal battle within the Republican party. This public feud quickly escalated into a stunning reversal.
In a dramatic turn, a Texas House Committee responded to Paxton’s accusations by initiating impeachment proceedings against the Attorney General himself. The committee, led by Republicans, unanimously recommended Paxton’s removal from office.
The move was seen by many as a direct defense of Paxton, who had positioned himself as a staunch protector of election integrity and a vocal opponent of what he described as a “Marxist horde.” The impeachment proceedings threatened to abruptly end Paxton’s career.
The impeachment attempt was unprecedented in recent Texas history, with Paxton becoming only the third official in the state’s nearly two-century existence to face such charges. The House of Representatives prepared for a vote that could have immediately removed him from power.
However, Paxton ultimately prevailed, being acquitted of all charges in a subsequent trial. Despite the acquittal, the Texas GOP formally censured Phelan for initiating the impeachment proceedings, signaling deep divisions within the party.
Years after the initial conflict, Phelan’s decision to leave office marks the culmination of a protracted and bitter political struggle. His departure signifies a significant shift in power dynamics within the Texas legislature and a potential realignment of priorities.
