A wave of anxiety is sweeping through the federal public service as whispers of a full return to the office intensify. Unions representing tens of thousands of workers are urgently seeking answers, fearing a mandate that could upend the current flexible work arrangements.
The Canadian Association of Professional Employees (CAPE) has formally requested clarification from the Treasury Board President, citing “persistent rumours” of a policy shift requiring up to five days a week in the office. CAPE’s president reports hearing unsettling signals from within the Treasury Board itself, though concrete details remain elusive.
Union leaders are voicing strong concerns about the potential financial and productivity costs of such a move. They argue that forcing a return to pre-pandemic work models would be a significant setback, squandering billions of dollars and diminishing employee output.
The Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) has also expressed alarm, pointing to a leaked document allegedly outlining the Treasury Board’s plans. While the government hasn’t confirmed the document’s authenticity, the possibility of a full return by 2027 is fueling unrest.
The current government directive requires a minimum of three days a week in the office for most employees, and four for executives. However, questions about a complete reversal of the current policy remain unanswered, with the department previously refusing to rule out a full return.
Treasury Board President Shafqat Ali claims to be unaware of any such plans, stating he’s only heard about them through news reports. This denial, however, hasn’t quelled the growing apprehension among public servants and their representatives.
Adding to the concerns, unions highlight the deteriorating condition of many federal office buildings. PSAC’s national president describes the potential plan as “reckless, costly and completely out of touch,” citing the state of infrastructure as a major issue.
The lack of communication and consultation is a recurring theme in the unions’ frustration. They emphasize a desire to collaborate with the government on return-to-office strategies, but feel sidelined and ignored.
This situation echoes recent decisions in other jurisdictions, such as Ontario and the City of Ottawa, which have both mandated a full return to the office for their public employees. The federal unions are determined to avoid a similar outcome, fearing the negative consequences for their members and the public service as a whole.
The uncertainty is creating a climate of anxiety and distrust. Unions are bracing for a potential battle, determined to protect the benefits of flexible work arrangements and advocate for a more sensible and productive approach.
