For years, questions have lingered about the 2020 election in Detroit, fueled by accusations of dishonesty and irregularities. Now, a meticulous investigation is underway, driven by a determination to uncover the truth behind the results that delivered a pivotal victory in Michigan.
Independent investigator Yehuda Miller spearheaded a landmark legal battle, ultimately winning access to nearly one million election documents from Detroit’s 2020 election. This victory unlocked a treasure trove of data – original absentee ballots, signed envelopes, applications, and precinct totals – all meticulously gathered and secured.
A team of Michigan’s leading election integrity experts has joined Miller, along with volunteers, to analyze this massive collection. They’ve already processed almost 40% of over 155,000 absentee ballot envelopes, revealing a pattern of anomalies that casts a long shadow over the official narrative.
The investigation is focused on a detailed comparison of absentee ballot applications and the corresponding envelopes. This painstaking process, facilitated by custom software developed by Check My Vote founder Phani Mantravadi, aims to reveal discrepancies and inconsistencies hidden within the data.
Early findings are deeply concerning. Investigators have identified ballots registered to nonexistent addresses, including one instance where a voter successfully registered and received a ballot at 8286 Auburn St., a confirmed fake address in Detroit. This voter has since been removed from the state’s voter rolls.
Other ballots present equally perplexing issues. One envelope bore a German address, inexplicably delivered on the same day it was signed, defying typical postal service timelines. Another voter bypassed standard requirements for overseas voters, registering with a Michigan address despite never having lived in the United States.
Numerous envelopes arrived without signatures, yet ballots were still issued and purportedly counted, despite clear instructions stating unsigned ballots would be rejected. In other cases, dates were altered by hand, seemingly to validate ballots received before they were officially signed.
The team uncovered ballots with conflicting dates – processed for the primary election but stamped for the general election, or signed *after* the official receipt date. One envelope bore six different, often illegible, time stamps from the city clerk.
These aren’t isolated incidents. The investigation continues to reveal a disturbing number of ballots that should have been flagged as invalid, yet were processed anyway. Each discovery adds another layer to a complex puzzle, demanding a thorough and unbiased examination.
The team remains committed to independent analysis, refusing to hand the project over to external entities that might compromise the integrity of the evidence. The meticulous work continues, driven by a relentless pursuit of clarity and accountability.
From uncovering the late-night ballot deliveries at the TCF Center to exposing voter application scams, previous investigations have already revealed troubling irregularities. This new effort seeks to build upon that foundation, providing irrefutable proof and demanding answers.
