President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. opened his fifth State of the Nation Address by pledging accountability for alleged graft in flood‑control projects, naming former House Speaker Martin Romualdez among those under investigation.
The opening signaled a political shift, acknowledging that restoring public trust requires confronting corruption even when it involves close allies.
Analysts stress that the administration’s credibility will depend on impartial prosecutions, institutional reforms, and full accountability rather than rhetoric.
Another commentator highlighted that naming the former speaker underscores the seriousness and breadth of the anti‑corruption drive, suggesting that the Ombudsman’s involvement expands the scope of scrutiny.
The same commentator expressed disappointment that the President did not outline specific steps to tackle corruption within the executive branch.
In the opening minutes, Marcos referenced survey data indicating public demand for action on flood‑control graft and reiterated his condemnation of the issue from the previous year’s address.
He noted that investigations over the past year have resulted in complaints against lawmakers and contractors, and that charges against Romualdez are nearing filing, according to the Ombudsman.
The President affirmed that personal ties will not deter him, stating he is not a president for his family or friends but for the Filipino people.
Romualdez issued a statement respecting the President’s remarks, asserting he has not sought special treatment, claims no law was broken, and is prepared to prove his innocence.
The Ombudsman’s preliminary investigation team ordered Romualdez and three other respondents to submit counter‑affidavits within 15 days, after which the case will proceed to resolution.
With less than two years left in his term, analysts argue that Marcos’ legacy will be measured by his ability to strengthen institutions, enforce accountability, and implement reforms that citizens can feel.
They also contend that lasting anti‑corruption impact requires institutionalising transparency and accountability within the executive branch, beyond the current limited Freedom of Information regulation.
