On a Wednesday hearing, Representative Mike Carey questioned Smithsonian leadership over the National Museum of American History’s decision to remove the phrase “American history” from its mission statement.
Carey cited a desire to move beyond an “America‑first mentality” and asked the museum’s administrator to explain the rationale behind the change.
The question reflects a wider debate about national identity and the role of public institutions in presenting history. Progressive scholars argue that confronting the darker chapters of the past can inform contemporary policy, while some conservatives view such efforts as undermining foundational American ideals.
Anthea Hartig, the museum’s administrator, explained that the revision aims to broaden perspectives and include voices that had previously been omitted, rather than to politicize the past.
She stated that the museum preserves evidence of American life in all its breadth so that visitors can draw their own conclusions, and that reframing traditional narratives involves adding previously excluded evidence and objects.
Hartig emphasized that examining difficult chapters is not hostile to America but rather a way to allow more Americans to see themselves in the national story.
Carey remained unconvinced, warning that denying history can destroy people and quoting a classic cautionary text on authoritarianism.
When pressed for a direct answer, Hartig did not provide one before the committee adjourned.
The debate coincides with the nation’s upcoming 250th anniversary and other significant milestones, heightening scrutiny of how history is presented by public institutions.
The National Museum of American History continues to face questions about balancing heritage preservation with inclusive storytelling.
