A 799-page report titled “An Attack Upon U.S. Critical Infrastructure” outlines alleged corruption in the 2020 election and its broader implications for national security.
The document proposes 18 prioritized election investigations and eight search warrants. Named entities include Runbeck Election Services, Elections Group LLC, the Office of the Georgia Secretary of State, Tyler Technologies, and the Associated Press.
Findings are based on forensic analyses, sworn legislative testimony, court filings, inspector general investigations, vendor invoices, open-source intelligence, and government communications obtained through litigation and public records requests.
The full report contains nine sections and an appendix of detailed findings and sources. A 10-page executive summary is also available.
The report documents 824 findings related to 2020 election security across 12 states and nine foreign nations. Of these, 553 are characterized as established facts, 155 as disputed facts, and 116 as analytically supported inferences.
The analysis is organized around ten converging vectors suggesting malfeasance across nearly all aspects of election administration. U.S. elections were designated as critical infrastructure in January 2017, placing them among 16 sectors vital to national security and public safety.
One detailed finding describes remote access to absentee ballot processing in Fulton County, Georgia. On October 23, 2020, poll computers were remotely accessed and data was deleted, with the incident documented internally but not referred for criminal investigation.
The report asserts that voting machines contained Chinese components and that related infrastructure involved foreign servers and code maintenance. It claims intelligence officials declined to document certain foreign interference in writing for political reasons.
Certification is described as a bypassed safeguard rather than a verification checkpoint. Officials in battleground states reportedly certified results despite missing records, statutory violations, and mathematical inconsistencies.
The report examines 64 lawsuits challenging the election. Plaintiffs faced denied records requests and limited discovery, with courts frequently declining to evaluate evidence they deemed speculative or inadmissible.
Concerns are raised over private funding of election operations, record destruction, and privileged access by vendors and nonprofit groups. The authors argue these factors undermined transparency and public accountability.
The report concludes that failure to address alleged manipulations threatens constitutional governance. It calls for federal and state investigations grounded in the documented findings.
