During the Winter Olympics in Cortina, a shocking moment unfolded as a Swiss broadcaster’s commentator launched a scathing attack on an Israeli bobsledder during a live event.
Stefan Renna, covering the men’s bobsleigh competition for RTS, unexpectedly shifted focus from the sport itself to past statements made by AJ Edelman, the Israeli team’s pilot. The commentary quickly spiraled into a deeply personal and politically charged accusation.
Renna alleged that Edelman had expressed support for actions described as “genocide in Gaza,” citing posts on social media and referencing terminology used by a UN Commission of Inquiry. He further claimed Edelman had minimized the gravity of the conflict, calling it “the most morally just war in history.”
The commentator didn’t stop there, referencing a mocking response Edelman made to a “Free Palestine” inscription and a connection to a fellow team member reportedly involved in military operations in Gaza. Renna then questioned Edelman’s eligibility to compete, drawing a pointed comparison to the restrictions placed on Russian athletes.
Renna’s commentary sparked immediate outrage, and was swiftly removed from the RTS website. He contrasted Edelman’s situation with that of a Ukrainian skeleton skier disqualified for displaying political messaging on his helmet, highlighting the inherent political nature of even the most celebrated sporting events.
Edelman himself responded to what he called a “diatribe,” expressing pride in his team’s accomplishment – a remarkable feat achieved without significant resources or a national program. He emphasized their dedication, resilience, and unwavering national pride.
The incident drew condemnation from prominent figures, including the American ambassador to Israel, who labeled the commentary as “Jew-hating” and “disgusting.” The response underscored the sensitivity and intensity surrounding the issue.
RTS defended the commentator’s intent, stating he aimed to question the IOC’s policies regarding athlete statements. However, they acknowledged the length and inappropriateness of the commentary for a sports broadcast, leading to its removal.
The International Olympic Committee offered a measured response, reiterating the importance of its values and the goal of bringing people together despite global conflicts. However, they deferred direct questions about the commentator’s remarks to the broadcasting organization.
Despite the controversy, Edelman and his team finished 26th out of 26 competitors, a testament to their determination in the face of extraordinary circumstances. Their story became a powerful symbol of perseverance and national identity on the world stage.
