A quiet rebellion is brewing within the Democratic party as President Trump prepares to deliver his State of the Union address. Faced with limited avenues for peaceful protest, a growing number of lawmakers are choosing to make a statement through their absence.
Instead of occupying seats in the House chamber, many Democrats are planning to gather at the Lincoln Memorial for a counter-event dubbed the “People’s State of the Union.” This rally, organized by activist groups, promises a focused critique of the President’s first year in office and a platform for dissenting voices.
A notable roster of Senators – including Ed Markey, Jeff Merkley, and Chris Murphy – have committed to attending the alternative event. They will be joined by a contingent of Representatives, signaling a coordinated effort to amplify opposition outside the traditional setting of the address.
However, not all Democrats are opting for a public demonstration. Some, like Senator Ruben Gallego and Representative Jared Golden, have chosen to forgo the State of the Union entirely, preferring to remain home as a quiet form of protest.
This year’s planned responses stem from past difficulties Democrats have faced in voicing their disapproval during the address. Previous attempts at dissent have often resulted in disruptive moments, creating unwanted spectacle and overshadowing the message.
The memory of Representative Al Green’s 2025 outburst – waving a cane and shouting at the President – remains fresh. He was ultimately removed from the House floor, a stark reminder of the boundaries of acceptable protest during the State of the Union.
This time, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has urged his caucus to choose between two paths: silent defiance within the chamber or a complete absence as a direct message to the President. The decision, he stated, is a matter of individual conscience.
Despite the internal divisions, Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer have announced their intention to attend the address. Their presence, even in silence, represents a commitment to engaging with the process, albeit with a clear undercurrent of disagreement.
Representative Green, while remaining tight-lipped about his plans for Tuesday, has indicated he will continue his “peaceful protest” and will not participate in post-address interviews, further emphasizing the depth of the divide.
The unfolding situation highlights a complex dynamic within the Democratic party – a struggle to balance the desire for forceful opposition with the need for strategic restraint in the face of a powerful presidency.
