The University of Notre Dame found itself at the center of a fierce controversy when Susan Ostermann, a professor with openly pro-abortion views, was initially selected to lead the prestigious Liu Institute for Asia and Asian Studies. The announcement ignited immediate and widespread backlash, challenging the university’s long-held Catholic identity.
Ostermann’s past writings, including a 2022 opinion piece, drew intense scrutiny. She argued against any restrictions on abortion, claiming such limitations were based on “utter falsities” and asserting the procedure was remarkably safe, even suggesting it was safer than common over-the-counter medication.
Her views extended beyond the procedure itself, with numerous op-eds alleging the pro-life movement was rooted in “white supremacy and racism,” and inherently misogynistic. These statements directly clashed with the foundational principles of the university she was poised to lead.
Students quickly mobilized. A prayer gathering at the university’s cherished Marian grotto, attended by Bishop Kevin Rhoades of Fort Wayne-South Bend, became a focal point for those concerned about Notre Dame’s direction. The event was a powerful display of faith and a plea for the university to uphold its Catholic mission.
A planned demonstration, “March on the Dome,” was organized as a further expression of concern, framed not as protest, but as an act of love for the university and a call for fidelity to its core values. Even after the initial announcement, organizers vowed to proceed, recognizing the larger issues at stake.
Bishop Rhoades became a leading voice questioning the appointment, expressing “dismay and strong opposition.” He highlighted Ostermann’s work with the Population Council, an organization with a history of promoting abortion globally and links to controversial population control policies.
The Bishop eloquently distinguished between academic freedom – the right to pursue research – and an administrative appointment with significant influence over the university’s public identity. He emphasized the potential for confusion and disappointment among the Notre Dame community.
Just days after the outcry began, Susan Ostermann announced she would not pursue the directorship. While a victory for those advocating for the university’s Catholic character, organizers of the “March on the Dome” acknowledged the larger struggle for Notre Dame’s soul was far from over.
The situation served as a stark reminder of the ongoing tension between academic institutions and their foundational values, and the importance of defending a clear Catholic identity in a rapidly changing world. The events sparked a renewed commitment to prayer and a determination to ensure Notre Dame remains true to its mission.
The university now faces the challenge of navigating a path forward, reaffirming its commitment to Catholic principles while fostering an environment of intellectual discourse. The incident underscored the deep affection and concern held by students, alumni, and the wider Catholic community for the future of this historic institution.
