TRUMP DECLARES WAR ON AI: Anthropic SHUTDOWN Imminent!

A sweeping order from the former President has effectively barred Anthropic AI from all federal use, escalating a conflict over control and national security. The directive came after the company refused demands from the Department of War, triggering a swift and decisive response.

The former President framed the situation as a battle against a “radical left, woke company” attempting to dictate military strategy. He asserted that the authority to determine how wars are fought rests solely with the Commander-in-Chief and appointed military leaders, not with a private technology firm.

Strong language characterized the former President’s statement, accusing Anthropic of a “disastrous mistake” and prioritizing its own terms of service over the U.S. Constitution. He warned that their actions endangered American lives, jeopardized troop safety, and threatened national security.

The order mandates an immediate cessation of Anthropic’s technology across all federal agencies, with a six-month phase-out period for departments like the Department of War currently utilizing their products. A stern warning accompanied the directive, hinting at “major civil and criminal consequences” should Anthropic impede the transition.

The dispute originated from the Department of War’s request for unrestricted access to Anthropic’s AI model for lawful purposes. Officials emphasized they sought to avoid any perception of mass surveillance of American citizens, clarifying that such practices are illegal and not their intention.

A Pentagon spokesperson vehemently denied accusations of pursuing autonomous weapons systems, labeling such claims as “fake” and propagated by partisan media outlets. The core issue, they stated, was simply securing the ability to utilize AI for legitimate military operations.

The Department of War issued a firm ultimatum, demanding a response by a specific deadline. Failure to comply, they warned, would result in the termination of the partnership and designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk, effectively cutting them off from future government contracts.

The spokesperson underscored the principle that no private entity would be permitted to dictate operational decisions to the military. This stance reflects a growing concern over the influence of technology companies on national security matters and the need to maintain control over critical defense capabilities.

The situation highlights a fundamental tension between technological innovation and national security prerogatives. It raises questions about the appropriate boundaries for AI development and deployment, particularly when it intersects with military applications and the protection of civil liberties.