A cloud of scrutiny is gathering around Congressman Eric Swalwell following reports of significant payments – totaling approximately $360,000 since 2021 – made to a campaign staffer. The payments, directed to a man named Darly Meyer, have sparked questions and raised eyebrows due to inconsistent explanations for their purpose.
Federal Election Commission filings reveal a pattern of over 75 payments to Meyer, varying widely in amount from small sums to over $12,000 at a time. These disbursements are categorized under a diverse range of justifications, including travel, car service, security, and even reimbursements for event flowers and postage.
Meyer’s earnings have steadily increased, exceeding $120,000 last year and currently on track to reach the same amount in 2025. This escalating financial relationship is drawing attention from former FEC commissioners, who suggest the inconsistencies warrant a formal investigation.
Swalwell responded to the reports with a pointed statement on social media, attributing the expenditures to security needs stemming from death threats directed at him and his family. He suggested a link between negative media coverage and the threats, even proposing to send the bill for security costs to a reporter.
Beyond his work for Swalwell’s campaign, Meyer operates a luxury car service in North Hollywood, specializing in chauffeured transportation. He also manages a Facebook group, “CaliHaitians,” described as a progressive community focused on networking and professional development within the Haitian diaspora.
The combination of substantial payments, varied justifications, and Meyer’s broader network is fueling speculation about the nature of his role within Swalwell’s political operation. The central question remains: what specific services justified this significant financial commitment, and what was the full extent of Meyer’s influence?
Experts are emphasizing the unusual nature of the financial records, suggesting the discrepancies should trigger a deeper audit by the FEC. The agency’s auditing arm may need to determine if the payments were legitimate expenses to a valid contractor, or if further explanation is required.
The situation presents a complex puzzle, demanding clarity regarding the financial relationship between a prominent congressman and a key member of his campaign team. The unfolding story promises further scrutiny and a demand for transparency.
