A U.S. Senate candidate from Maine, Graham Platner, recently voiced strong opinions regarding the Supreme Court, advocating for significant changes to its structure and membership. During a meeting with Somerset County Democrats, Platner outlined a plan to fundamentally alter the court if his party gains control of the Senate.
Platner argued the Supreme Court has become a “political action wing of conservatism,” abandoning its constitutional role. He explicitly called for “stacking the Court,” a term referring to increasing the number of justices to shift the ideological balance, and went further by suggesting impeachment proceedings against at least two current justices.
He expressed frustration with what he perceives as a lack of understanding among some Democrats regarding the power the Senate holds. Platner believes the Senate should “use every single lever of power” to address the court, asserting the Senate can define its own rules regarding judicial oversight.
This isn’t the first controversy surrounding Platner’s campaign. Prior reports have surfaced detailing past online statements considered by many to be racially insensitive and sexist. Further scrutiny revealed admissions of communist beliefs and a scandal involving a reported Nazi tattoo, leading to staff departures.
Platner’s comments raise questions about his understanding of the separation of powers within the U.S. government. Critics point out the potential hypocrisy of the Senate attempting to dictate the composition of the Supreme Court, a co-equal branch designed to provide checks and balances.
The candidate’s proposals have ignited debate about the appropriate role of political influence on the judiciary and the potential consequences of altering the fundamental structure of the Supreme Court. His vision for the Senate appears to prioritize aggressive action over traditional constitutional norms.
