A dramatic showdown unfolded in the House of Representatives Tuesday, centering on allegations of inappropriate contact between Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The core of the controversy revolves around communications that occurred during a 2019 congressional hearing involving Michael Cohen, former legal counsel to Donald Trump.
Representative Ralph Norman initiated the proceedings with a resolution to censure Plaskett and remove her from her position on the House Intelligence Committee. Norman argued her actions constituted a serious breach of ethics and a corruption of judgment, claiming her coordination with Epstein during official business was “disgraceful” and an “affront” to the institution.
The House initially voted to advance the censure measure, setting the stage for a final vote later in the evening. The debate ignited fierce partisan division, highlighting the deep political fractures within the chamber and the sensitivity surrounding the Epstein case.
Ultimately, the House voted 214 to 209 against censuring Plaskett. The outcome hinged on a surprising defection from within the Republican ranks, as six GOP lawmakers sided with Democrats to block the censure.
Three Republicans – Don Bacon of Nebraska, Lance Gooden of Texas, and Dave Joyce of Ohio – explicitly joined Democrats in opposing the censure. An additional three Republicans – Andrew Garbarino of New York, Jay Obernolte of California, and Dan Meuser of Pennsylvania – cast votes marked as “present,” effectively abstaining from the decision.
The revelation that Plaskett was exchanging text messages with Epstein and seeking his counsel during the Cohen hearing fueled the censure effort. Critics pointed to the communications as evidence of deeply compromised judgment and a potential conflict of interest while conducting official congressional business.
The failed censure attempt underscores the complex political dynamics at play and the challenges of holding lawmakers accountable for past conduct. The incident has sparked renewed scrutiny of relationships between powerful figures and individuals implicated in the Epstein scandal.