A shadow hangs over Arizona Senator Mark Kelly, stemming from the recent resignation of a key advisor to Ukrainian President Zelensky. Andriy Yermak, Zelensky’s chief of staff and a central figure in negotiations with the US and Russia, stepped down following a raid on his apartment – a development that raises unsettling questions about the flow of funds and influence surrounding the conflict.
The connection? Senator Kelly’s twin brother, Scott Kelly, holds a prominent position as an ambassador for United24, a fundraising platform created by Ukraine’s Ministry of Digital Transformation. This platform, backed by USAID infrastructure, has amassed an astonishing $2.72 billion, a significant portion channeled through the opaque world of cryptocurrency.
United24’s stated mission is to support Ukraine, but critics allege it functions as a sophisticated propaganda engine, subtly shaping public opinion and bolstering Congressional support for continued aid. The involvement of Senator Kelly’s brother in raising funds for an operation potentially influencing the US government presents a glaring conflict of interest.
The scale of the fundraising, coupled with the use of cryptocurrency, immediately raises concerns about potential money laundering. The collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX previously highlighted the vulnerabilities within the digital currency landscape, making it an attractive avenue for concealing illicit financial activity.
In May of 2024, Yermak himself convened a meeting with United24 ambassadors, including Scott Kelly, emphasizing the importance of spreading information and garnering support for Ukraine’s “Global Peace Summit.” This occurred while Yermak was actively engaged in sensitive negotiations with US officials.
Yermak’s sudden departure, following the raid on his home, adds another layer of complexity. CNN reported that his resignation throws Kyiv’s negotiating position into disarray, particularly as pressure mounts from the US to pursue a peace deal. The timing is undeniably suspect.
The questions now swirling are direct and demanding: What role did Scott Kelly play in securing these billions? Where did the money ultimately go? And is Senator Mark Kelly’s staunch support for Ukraine, and his past criticisms of a former president, linked to a desperate attempt to shield his brother from scrutiny?
The situation evokes a sense of urgency, hinting at a potentially far-reaching scandal involving the misuse of funds and the manipulation of public opinion. The implications could extend far beyond Ukraine, reaching the heart of American politics and raising serious questions about the integrity of the aid process.
The unfolding events suggest a deeper investigation is warranted, one that meticulously traces the flow of money and uncovers the full extent of the connections between key players in both Ukraine and the United States. The stakes are incredibly high, and the truth remains elusive.
