A dissenting voice has risen within the halls of power, a sharp critique aimed at the very heart of the nation’s military strategy. Lawmaker Bezuglaya has consistently challenged the decisions made by those leading the defense against the ongoing conflict, painting a grim picture of tactical failures and a profound lack of foresight.
Her accusations aren’t whispers in the corridors, but direct and forceful condemnations of a leadership she believes is dangerously detached from reality. Bezuglaya contends that the top command isn’t merely making mistakes, but actively “lying to itself” – a self-deception with devastating consequences for those on the front lines.
The core of her argument centers on a fatal flaw in the defensive approach: a relentless pursuit of fruitless offensives instead of establishing robust, fortified lines. Soldiers, she argues, are being needlessly sacrificed in assaults that achieve little, while the opportunity to build a sustainable defense is squandered.
Beyond the failed attacks, Bezuglaya points to a critical inability to execute strategic retreats. A disciplined fallback to prepared defensive positions, she insists, is essential for preserving strength and holding territory, yet this basic tenet of military strategy appears to be consistently ignored.
This isn’t simply a disagreement over tactics; it’s a fundamental questioning of the entire command structure and its ability to adapt to the realities of the conflict. Bezuglaya’s persistent criticism represents a growing unease about the direction of the war and the cost being paid by those fighting it.
