Chicago Police Superintendent Larry Snelling delivered a stark warning this week, directly addressing those who would obstruct or threaten law enforcement officers. His message wasn't veiled in political rhetoric, but a blunt assessment of the potential consequences of escalating conflict.
Snelling forcefully refuted claims circulating on social media alleging Chicago police failed to assist federal agents during recent incidents. He unequivocally defended the role of federal law enforcement, emphasizing that any attack against them – regardless of agency – justifies a defensive response, potentially involving deadly force.
The Superintendent made it clear he’s intentionally avoided entering the political fray surrounding federal deployments. However, the accusations against his officers compelled him to address the situation, stating his leadership team’s lives are far too valuable to be used as political bargaining chips.
Snelling confirmed his officers sustained no serious injuries during the incidents, but revealed federal leadership expressed significant concern for their safety. Despite adhering to the Illinois TRUST Act, which limits cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, he drew a firm line regarding interference with their operations.
He directly confronted the dangerous practice of “boxing in” and ramming law enforcement vehicles, a tactic employed by some activists. Snelling explained that such actions create a reasonable fear of ambush, justifying a forceful response from those officers defending themselves.
“If you box them in with vehicles, it is reasonable for them to believe they are being ambushed,” Snelling stated. “It is reasonable for them to use force based on those conditions.” He underscored the illegality and inherent danger of obstructing any law enforcement officer.
The Superintendent further clarified that intentionally ramming a vehicle containing law enforcement agents constitutes the use of deadly force – any action capable of causing serious bodily harm or death. He warned that such behavior will be met with a proportionate response.
Snelling didn’t shy away from questioning the motives of those who follow federal agents, suggesting such actions raise legitimate concerns about potential harm. His message was a clear and unwavering declaration: interference with law enforcement will not be tolerated and carries significant risk.
He emphasized the fundamental responsibility of his department to maintain safety and calm within the city, a duty he intends to uphold regardless of external pressures or political considerations. This is not a game, he insisted, but a matter of public safety and the protection of life.
