The term “Deep State” isn’t just a conspiracy theory; it’s a description of power relentlessly protecting itself. And at the heart of that power, for many, lies the figure of John Brennan, former CIA Director under Barack Obama.
Whispers of legal trouble for Brennan have circulated for months, centering on a reported DOJ subpoena issued in Florida. General Mike Flynn publicly questioned when Attorney General Pam Bondi would launch an investigation, a call echoing a growing demand for accountability.
The pressure intensified with revelations from Bryan Dean Wright, a former CIA colleague of Brennan’s. Wright asserts, with chilling clarity, that Brennan’s actions warrant imprisonment, stemming from his role in igniting the “Trump-Russia” investigation.
Newly released CIA details expose the agency’s creation of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election. This assessment, spearheaded by Brennan at Obama’s behest, became the foundation for years of accusations against then-candidate Donald Trump.
The evidence suggests a deliberate manipulation of the process. Brennan allegedly misrepresented his knowledge of the discredited Steele dossier, claiming he hadn’t read it while, according to former staffers, actively pushing for its inclusion despite warnings about its unreliability. He prioritized “narrative consistency” over factual accuracy.
Brennan didn’t simply allow the ICA to unfold organically. He demanded the CIA take the lead in drafting it, intentionally sidelining other intelligence agencies and the National Intelligence Council – a clear departure from standard procedure.
His involvement wasn’t limited to control; it extended to direct interference. The report details an “exceptional level of senior involvement” that likely influenced participants, compromised analytical rigor, and ultimately skewed the assessment’s conclusions.
A relentless timeline further fueled suspicions. CIA analysts felt “jammed” by Brennan’s rush to complete the ICA, even after the election had concluded, suggesting the assessment was less about understanding events and more about shaping a predetermined narrative.
The final, damning detail: Brennan and then-FBI Director James Comey widely disseminated the ICA – to over 200 officials – a highly unusual practice for such a sensitive document. This suggests a calculated effort to leak the information and inflict maximum damage on the incoming Trump administration.
Wright’s conclusion is stark: this wasn’t just an attempt to discredit a politician, but a threat to the Republic itself. A belief that a select few knew better than the voters, and were willing to abuse their power to enforce their vision.
The narrative aligns with long-held suspicions of a coordinated effort to undermine the Trump presidency, a “coup” attempt cloaked in the guise of national security. These concerns have persisted for over a decade.
Brennan recently faced deposition in a Florida court, and his response was strategically leaked to the New York Times – a publication often viewed as a conduit for information from within the “Deep State.” The leak itself is seen as a calculated move, a continuation of Brennan’s pattern of manipulating the media.
Many believe Brennan’s team orchestrated the leak, utilizing the Times as their preferred outlet. This echoes a history of CIA leaks designed to shape narratives and target President Trump.
The demand for justice is growing. For many Americans, the time for investigation is over. The call for Brennan’s arrest is not simply about retribution, but about restoring faith in a system that appears, to many, to have been profoundly abused.
