A recording from a Weber State University debate class has surfaced, revealing a professor’s deeply troubling statements. A student, Michael Moreno, captured audio of what he describes as blatant anti-White sentiment expressed during a debate preparation session.
The instructor, identified as Ryan Wash, allegedly asserted that fundamental concepts like science and the exploration of space were nothing more than “White Fantasies,” dismissing them as “fake.” This wasn’t simply a disagreement over scientific validity; it was a categorical rejection of established knowledge framed through a lens of racial bias.
The situation escalated further when Wash reportedly endorsed the idea of forcibly removing White people from Earth, a sentiment echoing the rhetoric of known extremist figures. He framed this within a debate exercise, tasking students with arguing against the validity of international space collaboration.
During the session, Wash guided students to argue that “space is not real,” a position seemingly unrelated to the debate topic but central to his broader assertions. He claimed that “Whiteness” actively appropriates science and technology to define truth, dismissing any evidence that doesn’t align with this framework.
When Moreno raised the example of Black astronauts who have demonstrably traveled to space, Wash challenged the student to *prove* their existence, suggesting a disturbing level of doubt and disbelief. He demanded verification, implying that such experiences couldn’t be accepted at face value.
Moreno argues that the instructor’s approach wasn’t a legitimate debate exercise, but rather a biased imposition of a single perspective. He points out the fundamental flaw of relying solely on personal experience as evidence, especially when that experience is used to invalidate universally accepted realities.
The instructor dismissed Moreno’s logical argument – that lived experience serves as proof of existence – as an act of “colonialism.” This response highlights a pattern of dismissing opposing viewpoints with charged, historically loaded terminology.
Wash further stated that “Whiteness as a structure definitely rules the world,” presenting it as a foundational argument. This declaration underscores the instructor’s apparent belief in a systemic power dynamic rooted in race, shaping his entire approach to the debate.
Moreno believes this incident represents a broader issue of academic corruption and indoctrination. He expressed concern that a “debate” class – a space meant for open exchange and intellectual diversity – was instead being used to promote a singular, biased ideology.
Weber State University acknowledged the video and stated that the audio was part of a larger discussion preparing the debate team for competition. The university affirmed its support for academic freedom and its commitment to protecting students and faculty from harassment and discrimination.
The university also indicated that a thorough review of the situation is underway, aiming to ensure all perspectives are fairly considered. However, the recording raises serious questions about the boundaries of academic discourse and the potential for bias within higher education.
This case reveals a disturbing undercurrent of prejudice potentially permeating academic institutions, raising concerns about the intellectual environment and the impact on students’ developing minds. It underscores the importance of critical thinking and the need for truly open and unbiased debate.
