J6 Cop's SHOCKING Call to ARMS: ICE Agents in the CROSSHAIRS!

J6 Cop's SHOCKING Call to ARMS: ICE Agents in the CROSSHAIRS!

A former Washington D.C. Metro Police officer, previously lauded for his role during the January 6th events, has ignited a firestorm with deeply controversial statements. Michael Favone, during a recent podcast appearance, issued a stark call to action, urging American citizens to consider armed resistance against agents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Favone’s comments stemmed from a broader condemnation of what he described as systemic abuse of power by ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). He asserted that instances of misconduct are not isolated incidents, but rather a pervasive pattern with potentially deadly consequences.

The former officer expressed profound frustration with the response of political leaders and law enforcement agencies, dismissing calls for calm and peaceful protest as insufficient. He demanded concrete action to safeguard citizens from what he characterized as an unchecked and dangerous federal agency.

Maya May and Michael Fanone engage in a discussion, sharing insights on relevant topics, with an American flag backdrop.

With forceful language, Favone directly challenged authorities, questioning their commitment to public safety. He argued that if government entities fail to protect their citizens, the American people have a right – and a responsibility – to defend themselves.

His most alarming statement explicitly advocated for the exercise of Second Amendment rights as a means of confronting ICE agents. Favone claimed the agency has become “unaccountable and lawless,” and is actively “killing Americans,” justifying potential armed self-defense.

This isn’t the first time Favone has voiced strong opinions on the matter. He has previously highlighted what he perceives as a long history of abuse by ICE and CBP, suggesting a pattern of disregard for due process and human rights.

The remarks have quickly drawn widespread condemnation and sparked intense debate about the limits of free speech, the role of law enforcement, and the appropriate response to perceived government overreach. The implications of a former officer advocating potential violence against federal agents are significant and far-reaching.