CBP SHOOTING COVER-UP: NYT ACCUSED OF BLATANT LIES!

CBP SHOOTING COVER-UP: NYT ACCUSED OF BLATANT LIES!

Saturday in Minneapolis, a confrontation unfolded that would tragically end in the death of Alex Pretti. Initial reports painted a picture of an innocent bystander, but a closer examination of the events reveals a far more complex and unsettling reality.

The situation began with federal agents attempting to detain an individual. A small group quickly gathered, including two vocal anti-ICE activists who aggressively approached the officers, seemingly intent on disrupting the process. Pretti wasn’t simply observing; he actively inserted himself into the escalating situation.

Video footage shows a Customs and Border Patrol officer physically pushing the two activists back, attempting to create space. Pretti then moved forward, placing himself between the officer and the women, a deliberate act of interference that escalated the tension.

Federal agents engage with a suspect in a tense moment, highlighting the critical events leading to a shooting incident.

What followed was a chaotic sequence of events. The officer, already dealing with the aggressive activists, deployed pepper spray in Pretti’s direction. Pretti, holding his phone, raised a hand to shield his face, but continued to move closer to the unfolding conflict.

Prior to the pepper spray, and crucially absent from some initial narratives, Pretti had already been asked to move out of the street by a CBP officer. He wasn’t a detached observer; he was repeatedly engaging with the situation, directing traffic and positioning himself as a central figure.

The video reveals a coordinated effort among the three individuals – the two activists and Pretti – all recording the encounter with their phones. Pretti wasn’t simply documenting; he was actively participating, even embracing one of the activists in a gesture of solidarity.

As officers attempted to detain Pretti, a struggle ensued. He was armed, carrying a concealed handgun and extra magazines, though he wasn’t carrying the required permit or identification at the time. This detail adds another layer of complexity to the rapidly unfolding events.

During the struggle, an officer removed Pretti’s gun from his waistband. The circumstances surrounding the subsequent discharge of the weapon remain under investigation, but it appears the gun may have gone off accidentally during the struggle, triggering a response from other officers.

Multiple shots were fired, and Pretti was fatally wounded. The question of whether the shooting was justified will be determined by federal investigators, but the narrative of an innocent bystander has been demonstrably challenged by the available evidence.

Those who legally carry concealed weapons are often among the most law-abiding citizens, acutely aware of the responsibilities and potential consequences associated with their permit. Pretti’s actions on Saturday, armed and actively intervening in a law enforcement action, present a stark contrast to that profile.