TRUMP & BIDEN'S SHOCKING ENERGY SECRET REVEALED!

The words of Yogi Berra – “It’s déjà vu all over again” – echo with startling clarity when considering recent energy policy shifts. The Trump administration’s halting of offshore wind projects along the East Coast mirrors the Biden administration’s cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline, despite appearing to be opposing actions. Both decisions, however, stem from political considerations that erode confidence in the energy sector. These reversals aren’t about energy sources; they’re about jeopardizing jobs and undermining our nation’s energy security. Predictability is paramount for energy companies and their workforce, whether they’re building pipelines, exploring for oil, or constructing wind farms. Investment hinges on a stable regulatory environment, and recent actions have shattered that stability. Colette Hirstius, president of Shell USA, publicly voiced these concerns, calling the halting of fully permitted wind projects “very damaging” to investment. Her point was stark: properly permitted energy projects should proceed, irrespective of political winds. This isn’t simply about defending wind energy; it’s a warning that the same fate could befall oil and gas projects. I supported the Biden campaign in 2020, believing in a pragmatic approach to policy. Yet, the cancellation of Keystone XL felt more symbolic than substantive. While no single project is a panacea, Keystone XL represented a significant investment in domestic energy security, backed by extensive environmental reviews and community engagement. Canceling it was a misstep. Offshore wind projects, like Revolution Wind off Rhode Island, had followed a similar rigorous path – years of reviews, approvals, and billions invested in planning and workforce development. Thousands of American workers – welders, engineers, electricians – depended on these projects for their livelihoods. Halting projects already under construction doesn’t just delay energy production; it fundamentally undermines the principles of doing business in America. Why would any company risk substantial capital on future energy infrastructure if an approved project can be arbitrarily canceled with a change in administration? The result is stagnation. Families are already struggling with high energy costs, exacerbated by constrained supply and excessive regulation. The solution isn’t to favor one energy source over another, but to pursue an “all of the above” strategy. We need to harness every resource available – oil, gas, nuclear, solar, hydro, and wind – to maximize our energy potential. For too long, America’s energy debates have been framed as zero-sum battles: fossil fuels versus renewables, traditional jobs versus clean technology. These false choices serve no one. We need all forms of energy, especially those produced domestically. An “all of the above” approach isn’t just sound economics; it’s smart politics. Voters are weary of constant policy swings and tired of being forced to choose sides. They want energy independence, reliable supply, and affordable costs. They want America to lead, and they want jobs – in every sector of the energy industry. Canceling Keystone XL was a mistake, and halting permitted wind projects is equally detrimental. If we are truly committed to energy dominance, we cannot afford to repeat these errors.