A dramatic turn unfolded Friday as a federal judge ordered the release of two individuals involved in a recent protest at a St. Paul church. Nekima Armstrong and Chauntyll Allen, facing serious federal charges, were deemed not to be significant flight risks by US District Judge Laura Provinzino.
The arrests stemmed from a Sunday incident where protestors stormed Cities Church, sparking a federal investigation. Armstrong, a prominent activist, now faces a charge of Conspiracy Against Rights, a crime carrying a potential ten-year prison sentence. The situation highlights a growing tension surrounding the limits of protest and the protection of religious practice.
Judge Provinzino’s decision wasn’t unconditional. Both Armstrong and Allen are required to surrender any existing passports or travel documents, and are prohibited from obtaining new ones. These stipulations underscore the gravity of the charges and the court’s intent to ensure their appearance for future proceedings.
Federal authorities allege Armstrong played a central role in orchestrating the disruption at the church. Homeland Security Investigators and the FBI moved swiftly, bringing charges under 18 USC 241, a law designed to protect civil rights. The case has ignited debate about the boundaries of free speech and the sanctity of religious spaces.
A second arrest quickly followed, with School Board member Chauntyll Allen also charged with conspiracy to deprive rights for her participation in the St. Paul protest. This escalation suggests a broader investigation into the individuals involved and the planning behind the event.
The investigation isn’t limited to Armstrong and Allen. A third protestor, William Kelly, has been arrested and charged with two separate federal counts. Authorities are actively pursuing further arrests, including a former CNN host, Don Lemon, and other individuals identified as potential defendants.
The Justice Department’s pursuit of these cases signals a firm stance on protecting religious freedom. As one official stated, the right to practice religion without obstruction is a cornerstone of American society, and any attempt to violate that right will be met with a strong legal response.
A magistrate judge initially refused to approve the complaint against Lemon and others, indicating potential complexities in building a case against these additional individuals. However, the Justice Department is continuing its efforts, suggesting a determination to hold all those involved accountable for their actions.
