GREENLAND GRAB: Johnson SHUTS DOWN Trump's Military Land Grab!

The possibility of a U.S. military intervention in Greenland has been firmly dismissed by House Speaker Mike Johnson, who stated he foresees no war and anticipates no deployment of American troops to the island.

Johnson unequivocally asserted that no declaration of war concerning Greenland is currently under consideration, emphasizing that the idea of a military presence there is simply not on the table. He expressed confidence that “boots on the ground” won’t be necessary “anytime soon.”

This stance echoes the foreign policy priorities championed by former President Trump, who consistently highlighted Greenland’s strategic importance to U.S. interests. The administration views the territory as vital for national security, access to critical minerals, and a range of other crucial factors.

Trump previously voiced a strong desire to acquire Greenland, warning that without U.S. ownership, rival superpowers like Russia or China could establish a foothold in the Arctic. He argued outright purchase, not a lease, is essential for the territory’s defense and the security of both the U.S. and NATO.

However, Greenland has repeatedly rebuffed these overtures. Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen recently affirmed the island’s preference for remaining a part of Denmark, stating a clear choice between the two nations in the face of geopolitical pressures.

Nielsen’s declaration, made alongside Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, underscored a unified stance within the Kingdom of Denmark. This firm position challenges the notion of a potential U.S. acquisition.

Johnson’s comments arrive as bipartisan lawmakers are actively working to restrict any unauthorized U.S. military action against NATO allies. This legislative effort is a direct response to Trump’s remarks regarding Greenland and concerns about potential breaches of collective defense agreements.

Representative Bill Keating is spearheading legislation to block funding for military interventions without congressional approval, framing the issue as a matter of broader U.S. security. The aim is to prevent any actions that could jeopardize relationships with allied nations.

Trump’s statement that the U.S. would act on Greenland “whether they like it or not” sparked considerable alarm among European leaders, raising fears of a violation of NATO’s core principles. The situation has prompted urgent diplomatic discussions.

Denmark’s and Greenland’s foreign ministers are scheduled to meet with high-ranking U.S. officials to discuss the situation, signaling the seriousness with which both sides are approaching this complex geopolitical issue.